If using babystep to adjust the Z probe offset, the axis will move and the mesh will be updated at the same time, causing a doubling of the Z offset over the rest of the print.
To correct for this, the current Z position would need to be modified in the opposite direction, canceling out the additional Z offset added to the mesh. This would be confusing to users, and moreover it would not be accurate without also taking the current Z fade level and current Z height into account.
It might make sense to change the mesh in the case where no babystepping is taking place, but this could be considered an undesirable side-effect of changing the `zprobe_zoffset`.
One way to remedy this would be to return to storing the mesh with `zprobe_zoffset` included, then subtracting `zprobe_zoffset` from the returned Z value. Thus, a babystep moving the Z axis up 1mm would subtract 1 from `zprobe_zoffset` while adding 1 to all mesh Z values.
Without including the `zprobe_zoffset` in the `z_values` there is no safe way to alter the mesh in conjunction with babystepping, although it's fine without it.
* Get UBL Mesh Generation, Mesh Save & Mesh Load working with 32-Bit platforms
* clean up read_data() and write_data() for non-LPC1768 HAL's
* Get read_data() and write_data() return codes consistent
All HAL's read_data() and write_data() return false if they succeed.
* Get read_data() and write_data() return codes to be consistent
Make read_data() and write_data() return true if an error happens.
* Say UBL is now checked out on machine types in default Configuration.h file.
Scott Lahteine