A number of regressions were patched also. The UBL G29 P2 and P4 Press and Hold had stopped working. It is very possible this is broken in the bugfix_v1.1.x branch also.
The main purpose of the Pull Request is to get the 3-Point mesh tilting to use the LSF algorithm just like the grid based mesh tilt. This simplifies the logic and reduces the code size some what. But the real reason to do it is the 3-Point case can be solved exactly. And by feeding these numbers into the LSF algorithm it provides a way to check all that code for 'correctness'.
If using babystep to adjust the Z probe offset, the axis will move and the mesh will be updated at the same time, causing a doubling of the Z offset over the rest of the print.
To correct for this, the current Z position would need to be modified in the opposite direction, canceling out the additional Z offset added to the mesh. This would be confusing to users, and moreover it would not be accurate without also taking the current Z fade level and current Z height into account.
It might make sense to change the mesh in the case where no babystepping is taking place, but this could be considered an undesirable side-effect of changing the `zprobe_zoffset`.
One way to remedy this would be to return to storing the mesh with `zprobe_zoffset` included, then subtracting `zprobe_zoffset` from the returned Z value. Thus, a babystep moving the Z axis up 1mm would subtract 1 from `zprobe_zoffset` while adding 1 to all mesh Z values.
Without including the `zprobe_zoffset` in the `z_values` there is no safe way to alter the mesh in conjunction with babystepping, although it's fine without it.
Scott Lahteine